ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Anticipation in soccer: skilled players benefit from early pattern recognition in corner kick situations.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The relationship between visual spatial working memory capacity of tennis players and visual information processing of offensive tactical decision-making.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Sub-Elite Youth Football Players: Predicting Recovery Through Machine Learning Integration of Physical, Technical, Tactical and Maturational Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticipation is a crucial cognitive skill for decision making in life. Especially in sports, such as soccer, accurately anticipating the next play of the opposing team can have a huge impact on the result of a game or individual success in certain situations. This study investigates the differences between skilled players and less-skilled players in anticipating corner kicks by using temporal and spatial occlusion paradigms to figure out, which visual cues are utilized. We presented 171 video scenes of realistic corner kicks - stopped at three time points (150 ms before ball, at ball contact, 150 ms after ball contact) - to 23 skilled soccer players and 23 less-skilled players. Participants had to predict the horizontal landing position of the ball. To examine the effectiveness of different visual cues, participants saw the respective corner kick in full detail (control condition), or with either the kicker or the attacking players being blurred. Results showed that predictive accuracy increases over time and is higher in skilled players than in less-skilled players. Further, it appears that skilled players use information from the attacking players (i.e., pattern recognition) to estimate the landing position. Information of the kicker was not sufficient for neither the skilled players nor the less-skilled players. Our data strongly suggests, that expert soccer players´ advantage over less-skilled players in anticipating the landing position of corner kicks results from their ability to recognize patterns of play. Again, these findings highlight the importance of prolonged times of sport-specific deliberate practice for athletes' predictive accuracy, and performance and success in general. Findings from this study could inform training regimes in soccer. By guiding players attention to useful visual cues (e.g., pattern recognition) while practicing set-pieces should help them to improve their anticipation skills. Future studies should explore these effects for situations like other set pieces or team-tactics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.