Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842602›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Category-like representation of statistical regularities allows for stable distractor suppression.

Catherine W Seitz, Anthony W Sali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Catherine W SeitzDepartment of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Anthony W SaliDepartment of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statistical learning allows observers to suppress attentional capture by salient singleton distractors appearing at a predictable location. This form of learning is in many cases inflexible, persisting into extinction and across changes in probability without strong contextual cues. However, the underlying learning mechanisms and nature of distractor probability representations remain unclear. Here, we replicated learned location-based distractor suppression in two experiments, both showing a reduction in attentional capture when a salient distractor appeared at a high-probability distractor location, alongside impairments in target selection at that same location. We then used computational modeling to explore whether the strength of suppression was best explained by continuous distractor frequency summation, reinforcement learning prediction errors, or a categorical all-or-nothing response. In both experiments, our data were most parsimoniously explained by a combination of a global exponential decay in response time with each distractor presentation paired with a categorical learning mechanism in which the most highly associated location was suppressed over all other locations. Our results suggest that the magnitude of suppression is more sensitive to overall probability differences than to subtle trial histories.

Indexed as

attentional captureattention mechanismcomputational modelingdistractor suppressionstatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID40842602
PMCPMC12365932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.