SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2025
Meta-analysis of mortality factors after COVID-19 infection in pediatric oncology patients.
Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: There are few clinical studies related to COVID-19 in pediatric cancer patients, and systematic reviews or meta-analyses on its mortality risk factors are particularly lacking. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to systematically analyze the mortality risk factors of pediatric cancer patients after COVID-19 infection, providing effective evidence-based medical evidence for epidemic prevention and control and clinical treatment of pediatric COVID-19 patients. Methods: Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched using "cancer" "COVID-19" "children" "mortality" related subject headings and keywords. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Outcomes included age, weight, clinical complications in patients, cancer type, consolidation of cancer treatment, and critical illness. The quality of observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, which includes criteria such as study population selection, comparability, and evaluation of exposure or outcome, by two independent reviewers. Results: A computerized search of the literature yielded six observational studies with a total of 2,696 patients, and a pooled assessment of predictive factors revealed that the occurrence of adverse clinical complications, the presence of solid tumors, and the presence of acute and critical conditions significantly increased mortality in pediatric oncology patients (P < 0.05), although, overall, aggressive consolidation of cancer treatment significantly reduced the death of patients. Although overall,being in the cancer consolidation treatment period is significantly associated with a reduced risk of patient mortality, there is still an increase in mortality with Radiotherapy, possibly due to immunocompromise (P < 0.05), whereas Immunotherapy and Surgery do not affect patient prognosis. Subgroup analyses showed that prolonged consolidation of cancer treatment reduced mortality. The sensitivity analysis of the results of the outcome indicators was stable with low sensitivity and high confidence. Conclusion: Adverse clinical complications, the presence of solid tumors, and the occurrence of critical conditions increase mortality in pediatric cancer patients. Receiving aggressive cancer treatment is associated with lower mortality rates, but this association should be interpreted with caution, as it may be confounded by other factors. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD420250570932.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.