Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842510›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology

The Need for Regulated Training and Certification for Providers Entering into Aesthetic Medicine.

Abby Gaskell, Kirsten Brondstater

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Abby GaskellDrs. Gaskell and Brondstater are with Shenandoah University in Winchester, Virginia.
Kirsten BrondstaterDrs. Gaskell and Brondstater are with Shenandoah University in Winchester, Virginia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing demand for aesthetic procedures leads to an influx of providers entering the field, many of whom lack formal training in aesthetic medicine. The absence of standardized education and certification poses significant risks to patient safety, including improper technique, adverse complications, and unethical practice. Without clear regulatory oversight, nonmedically trained individuals and inadequately trained healthcare professionals offer aesthetic treatments, leading to inconsistent outcomes and diminished public trust in the field. This article examines the urgent need for regulated training and certification to establish competency benchmarks and ensure patient safety. A tiered education model provides foundational, intermediate, and expert-level training, with standardized curricula covering anatomy, injection techniques, complication management, ethics, and legal considerations. Professional organizations and regulatory bodies play a key role in accrediting training programs, defining the scope of practice, and enforcing licensure requirements. Legislative measures, including mandatory certification, continuing education, and enforcement mechanisms, maintain high standards in aesthetic medicine. Implementing a structured training framework enhances provider competency, reduces adverse events, and reinforces ethical practice. Standardized regulation safeguards patient well-being and preserves the credibility and integrity of the aesthetic medicine industry.

Indexed as

Aesthetic medicinecertificationcompetency standardsmedical ethicspatient safetyregulated trainingscope of practice

Identifiers

PMID40842510
PMCPMC12367292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.