Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842474›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Multimodal AI-driven object detection with uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular risk assessment in autistic patients.

Ling Tang, Chengchao Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ling TangEast China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai, China.
Chengchao ShenDepartment of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed medical diagnostics, offering enhanced precision and efficiency in detecting cardiovascular risks. However, traditional diagnostic approaches for cardiovascular risk assessment in autistic patients remain limited due to the complexity of medical data, inter-individual variability, and the challenges of integrating multi-modal clinical information. Conventional methods, relying heavily on manually extracted features and rule-based analysis, often fail to capture subtle cardiovascular abnormalities, leading to suboptimal clinical outcomes. Methods: To address these limitations, we propose an AI-driven object detection framework that leverages advanced deep learning techniques for automated, accurate cardiovascular risk assessment in autistic patients. Our approach integrates multi-modal medical data, including imaging and electronic health records, through a novel feature fusion mechanism, enhancing diagnostic precision. Furthermore, an uncertainty quantification module is embedded to improve model interpretability and reliability, addressing concerns regarding AI-based medical decision-making. Results: Experimental evaluations demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms traditional diagnostic techniques in sensitivity and specificity, making it a robust tool for clinical applications. Discussion: The proposed framework represents a significant step towards personalized and data-driven cardiovascular care for autistic patients, aligning with the need for tailored diagnostic solutions in this specialized medical domain.

Indexed as

AI-driven diagnosticscardiovascular risk assessmentmulti-modal data fusionobject detectionuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID40842474
PMCPMC12364897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.