ArticleMolecular informatics2025
Machine Learning-Based Identification of Petroleum Distillates and Gasoline Traces Using Measured and Synthetic GC Spectra from Collected Samples.
Article in Molecular informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ignition cases involving arsons are typically handled by forensic experts who examine spectra of samples collected from scenes of fire to test for the existence or absence of ignitable liquids. This is tedious work, since many cases do not involve such liquids. To facilitate this process, we have developed in this work a Machine Learning (ML)-based workflow for samples' classification based on their gas chromatography (GC) chromatograms (i.e., spectra). To this end, annotated spectra of 181 samples containing three groups of liquids (petroleum distillates, gasoline, and an assortment of other substances) collected from fire scenes as well as two reference databases were obtained from the Israeli Department of Identification and Forensic Sciences (DIFS). These spectra were used for the derivation of ML-based classification models using three algorithms, namely, kNN, representative spectrum, and random forest (RF) giving rise to reliable predictions. To increase the size of the dataset to a level that would enable the usage of more advanced ML algorithms, we have used the experimental spectra to develop a new spectra synthesis algorithm and utilized it to generate a large dataset of synthetic spectra. This dataset was used for the derivation of new kNN, RF, and representative spectrum models as well as deep learning (DL) models producing F1-scores over an independent test set composed entirely of "real" spectra ranging from 0.74-0.95, 0.86-0.95, 0.30-0.75, and 0.85-0.96 for kNN, RF, representative spectrum, and DL, respectively. Following the completion of the work, a second set of real spectra was provided to us by DIFS, and modeling it with the second set of models yielded F1-scores ranging from 0.92-0.96, 0.96-1.00, 0.71-0.82, and 0.95-0.98 for kNN, RF, representative spectrum, and DL, respectively. These results therefore suggest that for this dataset, performances depend more on the size of the dataset used for model training than on the ML algorithm. We propose that the workflow and spectra synthesis algorithm developed in this work could be readily applied to other forensic domains where samples are characterized by spectra, either solely or in combination with other parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.