ReviewCurrent opinion in pediatrics2025
Resurgence of pertussis: whopping the '100-day cough'.
Review in Current opinion in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Early detection of pertussis related activity by wastewater surveillance ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- A National Study of Tetanus Vaccine Knowledge, Receipt and Acceptance Among Emergency Department Patients.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Atypical pertussis: Family cluster case series and primary care management strategies.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Analysis of epidemiological characteristics and vaccine effectiveness of pertussis in Linping District, China.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Post-marketing safety surveillance of tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine: a disproportionality analysis of the vaccine adverse event reporting system (2015-2025).Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Preliminary epidemiological and clinical profile of the 2024 pediatric pertussis outbreak: a retrospective analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewAgainst the WHO's report of 84% diphtheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT) primary vaccination coverage globally, the resurgence of pertussis (whooping cough), contributing factors and measures to control it are described. RECENT
findingsUSA and China, with 94-97% primary DPT immunization uptake, reported a 6-fold and 65-fold increase in pertussis between two time periods in 2023 and 2024. The global post-COVID-19 pertussis epidemic is trending towards a shift from infants towards older persons. Macrolide resistance is prevalent in 98% of Bordetella pertussis strains in China and is now reported from other countries. Pertactin-deficient mutant acellular pertussis vaccine-evasive strains are now transmitted in older children and adults. Pertactin-producing B. pertussis is causing fulminant pertussis in newborns whose mothers were not immunized in pregnancy and in under-immunized infants. Circulating epidemic strains of B. pertussis were discordant to those contained in whole-cell (Bp137) pertussis vaccine. The pertussis resurgence maybe explained by increased case ascertainment and reporting, mutant B. pertussis strains with immune escape from acellular and whole cell vaccines, and/or macrolides, waning natural, or vaccine-induced immunity and COVID-19 pandemic factors. SUMMARY: Pertussis maybe curtailed with public education, active clinical and microbiological surveillance, appropriate antimicrobial treatment and prophylaxis, public health reporting, infection control and optimized immunizations to reduce attributable morbidity and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.