Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842388›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025

Ten Years of High and Intensive Care Within Psychiatry: Professionals' Reflections Upon Developments and Future Implications.

I C de Jong Isa, A L van Melle Laura, S Gerritsen Sylvia, C L Mulder Cornelis, M A van den Hoven Mariëtte, Y Voskes Yolande

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

I C de Jong IsaDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7140-2043
A L van Melle LauraDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1607-5889
S Gerritsen SylviaDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7098-2423
C L Mulder CornelisDepartment of Psychiatry, Epidemiological and Social Psychiatric Research Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9908-4547
M A van den Hoven MariëtteDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1416-0972
Y Voskes YolandeDepartment of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0211-8892

Funding

Dutch Mental Health Care Institutions
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, psychiatric wards across the Netherlands have worked in accordance with the High and Intensive Care model to reduce coercion and improve the quality of care. Securing implementation of the model within a challenging mental health care context has proven to be effective but complex in practice. Consequently, this study aimed to both gain insight into the process of implementing the High and Intensive Care model by drawing upon professionals' own reflections and provide recommendations for improving practice and the model. This is a national multicentre study that utilised qualitative methods. Data was collected by a total of 26 institutional and national group interviews on which thematic analysis was conducted. Staff turnover, coercion, collaboration with outpatient care, working methodically and the move from control to contact were found to be the key developments since the model's implementation. Future efforts should focus upon staff retention and acquisition to ensure continuity of care and safety. Ongoing evaluation of coercion is essential to further reduce coercion. Collaborations with outpatient care and other stakeholders should be intensified to promote effective care. Management support, reflexivity and a clear vision are required to strengthen methodical working and collaboration between wards to create uniformity of practice. Working in contact with patients ensures safety but requires time and behavioural change. Applying implementation science can support improvements in acute mental health care by systematically addressing barriers to change, promoting sustainable evidence-based practices, and guiding the reduction of coercion. Further research into these barriers, including the exploration of non-coercive strategies and stakeholder involvement, is needed to enhance High and Intensive Care implementation and similar practices.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareMental DisordersPsychiatric Department, HospitalPsychiatric NursingCoercionHumansNetherlandsQualitative Researchcoercioncritical caremental healthpsychiatric department, hospitalquality of health care

Identifiers

PMID40842388
PMCPMC12371386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.