ArticlePalliative & supportive care2025
Evaluating the impact of early dignity therapy on quality of life in patients with brain tumors: A pilot study.
Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesBrain tumors are associated with negative changes in sense of self and increased distress early in the illness trajectory. Dignity Therapy (DT) is a brief 2-session therapeutic intervention for patients at end-of-life (EOL) that helps conserve a patient's sense of dignity or self. DT has shown positive results for patients at EOL including increased meaning, improved quality of life (QOL), and reduced distress, with limited research to date on patients early in their illness trajectory (non-EOL). This pre-post design pilot study investigated the benefits and feasibility of DT for 2 groups of patients with incurable brain tumors.
methodsA total of 51 participants were recruited, of whom 39 participated. Participants were grouped as EOL (prognosis < 1 year,
resultsThe intervention had a high completion rate, with 37 of 39 participants (95%) completing DT. Linear regression models fitted with generalized estimating equations (GEEs) showed within- and between-group significant changes in all domains for both groups, but were particularly beneficial for non-EOL participants. SIGNIFICANCE OF
resultsThis study demonstrated that DT effectively enhanced psychosocial well-being in patients with brain tumors, including reductions in death anxiety and dignity-related distress. Non-EOL participants benefited most and had higher completion rates, highlighting the intervention's feasibility and the need for further research in earlier stages of terminal illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.