ArticleClinical and translational medicine2025
Multi-omics analysis revealed biomarkers for coronary atherosclerosis: Occurrence and development.
Article in Clinical and translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Surgical Repair of Multiple Coronary Artery Aneurysms With Multivessel Coronary Disease.JACC. Case reports · 2026Article
- Multi-omics analysis revealed biomarkers for coronary atherosclerosis: Occurrence and development.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary atherosclerosis (CA) is a leading cause of cardiovascular diseases with the high morbidity and mortality; however, the current diagnostic methods, primarily based on symptoms, signs, lab examination and imaging, are often inadequate for detecting subclinical or early-stage CA, costly, and inaccessible in many cases. The objective of this study was to discover sensitive and specific biomarkers for the diagnosis of CA severity.
methodsWe enrolled 443 participants, including CA patients and healthy controls, from three independent cohorts: discovery, testing, and blinded validation. Multi-omics data integration during the discovery phase identified key features of atherosclerotic progression and potential biomarkers. Biomarker panels were refined using random forest models in the testing cohort, and their performance was evaluated in a blinded validation cohort to assess their ability to monitor the occurrence and development of CA.
resultsMulti-omics analysis revealed that plasma metabolites exhibited the strongest correlation with CA severity, effectively distinguished different CA stages from healthy controls. Post hoc analysis confirmed the diagnostic model's robustness, with an AUC value higher than .933 (95% CI: .828-.984, sensitivity 93.75%, and specificity 80%). In the blinded validation cohort, the biomarker panel achieved AUC values of .821-.898 for CA occurrence and .649-.849 for CA severity. Notably, 90% of these biomarkers remained significant after adjusting for comorbidities (p < .05).
conclusionsThis study identified significant metabolic changes during CA progression and established biomarker panels with potential diagnostic value for assessing CA severity. Key metabolites including cholesteryl sulphate, azelaic acid, tryptophan, arabinofuranosyluracil, TMAO, ADMA, LPC18:2, tartaric acid, L-citrulline, and L-proline, purine, sorbitol, and 2-aminoadipic acid. These findings highlight the potential of these biomarkers to improve early diagnosis and personalised management of CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.