ArticleHealth information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia2026
Risk prediction model for early detection of urinary tract infection in a hospital setting in Australia.
Article in Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospital-acquired complications have detrimental effects on patient outcomes and recovery, with increased morbidity and mortality burdens, and hospital efficiency. The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare has identified 16 high-priority complications, including healthcare-associated infections, as potential targets of clinical risk mitigation strategies. Within the North Metropolitan Health Service in Western Australia, the prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) was recognised as one of the most ubiquitous hospital-acquired complications and thus, there was desire to find new and innovative ways to enhance the existing infection prevention and control practices.
objectiveTo develop a risk prediction model for early identification of inpatients at risk of acquiring a UTI, to support clinical processes to facilitate targeted intervention strategies.
methodPrognostic modelling techniques were employed using retrospective hospital separation data encompassing patient and local health service factors.
resultsThe risk prediction model, developed from approximately 350 variables, used just 9 factors: 2 patient characteristics (age, gender), 4 clinical factors (paraplegia, dementia, prostate hyperplasia, neurosurgeon care), and 3 process measures (hospital stay duration, long theatre time, intensive care unit stay). It predicted UTI risk with 91% sensitivity, 86% specificity, and 95% discrimination (area under the curve). Real-time use in ward settings suggested it could help reduce hospital-acquired urinary tract infections (HAUTIs).
conclusionPredictive modelling techniques can identify patients at risk of developing a HAUTI with high sensitivity and specificity. The resulting model can be used as a real-time clinical decision-making tool to guide proactive interventions and help reduce the prevalence of UTIs among hospital inpatients.Implications for health information management practice:The development and successful validation of a real-time predictive model for HAUTIs demonstrates how health information managers can leverage routinely collected data to support proactive clinical risk mitigation. Integrating such models into electronic health record systems can enhance patient safety, improve clinical workflows, and inform targeted infection control interventions across hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.