ArticleClinical genetics2026
Molecular Landscape in Limb Anomalies: Diagnostic Yield and New Candidate Genes.
Article in Clinical genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Landscape in Limb Anomalies: Diagnostic Yield and New Candidate Genes.Clinical genetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Congenital limb anomalies remain without an etiological diagnosis in up to 65% of patients. To help close this gap, we describe the genetic diagnostic outcomes of a large cohort. Patients whose primary indication for genetic consultation was a limb anomaly were included from 2014 to 2024. Demographic, investigation, and diagnostic information were extracted, described, and compared. One hundred and thirty-two patients were included in the final cohort, with an average molecular diagnostic yield of 36%. The most common conditions were polydactyly (24%) and radial anomalies (19%). Fifty percent had syndromic features. Seven (5%) patients underwent chromosomal microarray (CMA) only, 81 (63%) CMA and a gene panel, and 43 (32%) subsequently underwent exome sequencing. Exome yielded a diagnosis in 11 (25%). We identified 25 novel mutations in known disease-causing genes, including TBX3 (3 cases) and expanded the phenotype of several loci, including BMP4 and HNRNPH2. Finally, we identified two new limb anomalies candidate loci, for which previously published mouse studies from other groups suggested roles in limb development: HOXA11 and a 2q31.1 deletion involving HOXD10 and HOXD12. This represents the second largest described limb anomalies cohort. Exome-wide sequencing associated with literature and database searches for mouse data represents an opportunity to identify novel etiologies in this group of disorders, including two candidate loci we identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.