ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2025
Co-Design in the Adaptation of a Clinical Decision Support System to Aid Violence Risk Assessment and Management: A Case Study.
Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engaging Service Users in Co-Designing a Nurse-Led Weight Talk Tool for Low- and Medium-Secure Mental Health Inpatient Settings: A Participatory Intervention Development Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- A Mixed Methods Feasibility Study of a Clinical Decision Support System Designed to Assess Risk for Aggression and Prevent Aggressive Behaviour.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe electronic application of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) conjoining the Dynamic Appraisal of Situational Aggression and the Aggression Prevention Protocol has been shown to be effective in reducing coercion and workplace violence in forensic settings in Australia. However, there is currently a lack of knowledge on the successful implementation of CDSSs across different cultural environments.
aimTo describe the use of co-design in the adaptation of a CDSS, the eDASA+APP-FI in Finland.
methodThis qualitative case study followed a co-design framework involving a variety of methods, including analysing project data, rapid ethnography, and analysing the notes from co-design workshops.
resultsThe adaptation of the CDSS into the local context included changes to the training programme and in the frequency of use of the CDSS, as well as linguistic adjustment. DISCUSSION: The co-design framework was valuable in identifying adaptation needs and in providing a sense of ownership among staff and consumers. LIMITATIONS: Co-design can be time-consuming in clinical environments. IMPLICATIONS: The results emphasise the importance of co-design in the identification of adaptation needs as part of the implementation process of a CDSS. RECOMMENDATIONS: Co-design can be used as a framework when aiming to create a feasible CDSS.
trial registrationNCT anonymised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.