Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842057›Full record

GuidelineThe journal of trauma and acute care surgery2025

Tranexamic acid in trauma: A joint position statement and resource document of NAEMSP, ACEP, and ACS-COT.

Whitney J Barrett, Kevin A Kaucher, Ross E Orpet, Eric M Campion, Jeffrey M Goodloe, Peter E Fischer, Christopher B Colwell, John W Lyng

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in The journal of trauma and acute care surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Whitney J BarrettFrom the Department of Emergency Medicine (W.J.B.), and Department of Pharmacy Practice (K.A.K.), University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico; Department of Emergency Medicine (R.E.O.), Montrose Regional Health, Montrose; Department of Surgery (E.M.C.), Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, Colorado; Department of Emergency Medicine (J.M.G.), University of Oklahoma School of Community Medicine, Tulsa, Oklahoma; Department of Surgery (P.E.F.), Washington Regional Medical Center, Fayetteville, AR; Department of Emergency Medicine (C.B.C.), University of California at San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California; and Department of Emergency Medicine (J.W.L.), North Memorial Health Level I Trauma Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kevin A Kaucher
Ross E Orpet
Eric M Campion
Jeffrey M Goodloe
Christopher B Colwell
John W Lyng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractPrehospital use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has grown substantially over the past decade despite contradictory evidence supporting its widespread use. Since the previous guidance document on the prehospital use of TXA for injured patients was published by the National Association of EMS Physicians, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, and the American College of Emergency Physicians in 2016, new research has investigated outcomes of patients who receive TXA in the prehospital setting. To provide updated evidence-based guidance on the use of intravenous TXA for injured patients in the emergency medical services (EMS) setting, we performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.The National Association of EMS Physicians, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, and the American College of Emergency Physicians recommends:• Prehospital TXA administration may reduce mortality in adult trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock when administered after lifesaving interventions.• Prehospital TXA administration appears safe, with low risk of thromboembolic events or seizure.• The ideal dose, rate, and route of prehospital administration of TXA for adult trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock has not been determined. Current evidence suggests EMS agencies may administer either a 1-g intravenous/intraosseous dose (followed by a hospital-based 1-g infusion over 8 hours) or a 2-g intravenous/intraosseous dose as an infusion or slow push.• Prehospital TXA administration, if used for adult trauma patients, should be given to those with clinical signs of hemorrhagic shock and no later than 3 hours post-injury. There is no evidence to date to suggest improved clinical outcomes from TXA initiation beyond this time or in those without clinically significant bleeding.• The role of prehospital TXA in pediatric trauma patients with clinical signs of hemorrhagic shock has not been studied, and standardized dosing has not been established. If used, it should be given within 3 hours of injury.• Prehospital TXA administration, if used, should be clearly communicated to receiving health care professionals to promote appropriate monitoring and to avoid duplicate administration(s).• A multidisciplinary team, led by EMS physicians, that includes EMS clinicians, emergency physicians, and trauma surgeons should be responsible for developing a quality improvement program to assess prehospital TXA administration for protocol compliance and identification of clinical complications.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsEmergency Medical ServicesShock, HemorrhagicTranexamic AcidWounds and InjuriesHumansReview Literature as TopicAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic AcidhemorrhagepharmacologyPrehospitaltrauma

Identifiers

PMID40842057
PMCPMC12363306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.