ArticleThe Journal of ambulatory care management
Diabetes MESSAGES: A Learning Collaborative to Support Community Health Centers in Implementing and Sustaining Group Visits.
Article in The Journal of ambulatory care management. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of the Diabetes MESSAGES study was to support community health centers (CHCs) in implementing diabetes group visits (GVs). In this paper, we describe the training and technical assistance provided and evaluate implementation and sustainability. CHC teams attended in-person learning sessions and regular web-based check-ins, implemented a 6-month GV program, and completed surveys and reports. We analyzed changes in staff knowledge and attitudes from pre- to post-training. We measured adoption, engagement, fidelity, tailoring, staff satisfaction, and barriers and facilitators to implementation. Using a mixed-methods multi-site case study approach, we identified factors related to sustainability. All 7 CHC teams successfully implemented GVs for 6 months; 4 continued GVs after the study period. Teams adapted the GV model to their local contexts while retaining the core elements of individual medical care, group education, goal setting, and social support. Staff enjoyed GVs and thought they benefited patients. Key factors that differed between sites that continued GVs and sites that did not were team cohesiveness, experience, and stability; success in operationalizing GV model components; ongoing adaptation and improvement; and ability to demonstrate benefits and address concerns regarding the organizational impact of GVs. The Diabetes MESSAGES learning collaborative offered a flexible GV model, a roadmap for implementation, expert coaching, and co-learning with other CHCs. CHCs succeeded in implementing diabetes GVs despite barriers. Lessons learned may be useful for others hoping to establish and maintain their own GV programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.