Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842032›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

The dental anxiety scale (DAS) - psychometric properties and longitudinal findings among middle-aged adults.

David Bantel, Witold X Chmielewski, Elmar Brähler, Yve Stöbel-Richter, Markus Zenger, Katharina Marilena Weil, Hendrik Berth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

David BantelCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. david.bantel@hin.ch.
Witold X ChmielewskiInstitute for Psychological Psychotherapy, University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Elmar BrählerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Yve Stöbel-RichterFaculty of Managerial and Cultural Studies, University of Applied Sciences Zittau/Görlitz, Görlitz, Germany.
Markus ZengerDepartment of Applied Human Studies, University of Applied Sciences Magdeburg-Stendal, Stendal, Germany.
Katharina Marilena WeilCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Hendrik BerthCarl Gustav Carus Faculty of Medicine, Division of Psychological and Social Medicine and Developmental Neuroscience, Research Group Applied Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Dental Anxiety Scale (DAS) is a well-established instrument for assessing dental anxiety. While numerous cross-sectional studies have examined the DAS, longitudinal research investigating age-related changes, reliability, validity over time, associations with mental and physical health, and demographic determinants remains limited. Furthermore, the possibility of longitudinal changes in its factor structure has received limited attention.

methodsIn 2013/2014, N = 329 German adults (53.6% female, mean age 40.20 years) and in 2019/2020, N = 323 adults (55.7% female, mean age 47.15 years) completed questionnaires, including the DAS, Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3), Health-Score (G-Score), Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-2), Short Scale for General Life Satisfaction (L-1), and oral health behavior items. DAS reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and factor structure via principal component analyses (PCA). Longitudinal dynamics were analyzed using McNemar's test. Associations between dental anxiety and independent variables were investigated using correlational analyses and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

resultsDAS significantly declined from 2013/2014 (M = 9.47) to 2019/2020 (M = 9.21). Internal consistency was excellent (α/Ω = 0.93), and a correlation of dental anxiety across waves was high (rs = 0.79). PCA revealed a stable one-factor structure (2013/2014: 82.25%, 2019/2020: 82.86% explained variance). McNemar test indicated no significant changes in the proportion of subjects with or without dental anxiety over time. Higher dental anxiety was significantly correlated with lower levels of: life satisfaction, perceived influence over health, condition of health, physical and mental health, and social support in both waves (all rs ≥ 0.14; p ≤ 0.015). A significant decrease in dental anxiety over time was observed in participants with frequent tooth brushing, no indication for depression, and at least moderate social support (all z ≤ -2.07, all p ≤ 0.019).

conclusionsThis study provides evidence for DAS's reliability, temporal stability, and construct validity. Although dental anxiety showed a statistically significant decline it remains relatively stable for most participants. Findings indicate meaningful associations with psychosocial, behavioral, and health-related factors, supporting the potential value of interdisciplinary approaches that include psychological support in oral health care.

Indexed as

Dental AnxietyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsAdultFemaleGermanyHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedOral HealthReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultsDASDental anxiety scaleLongitudinal studyOral health

Identifiers

PMID40842032
PMCPMC12372296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.