SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2025
Enzyme replacement therapy for the treatment of late onset Pompe disease: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- The cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapies versus best supportive care for treating late onset Pompe disease in the UK NHS.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Real-Life Effectiveness After Switching to Avalglucosidase Alfa in Late-Onset Pompe Disease Patients Worsening on Alglucosidase Alfa Therapy: A French Cohort Study.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional assessment of diaphragmatic dysfunction in late-onset Pompe disease: a prospective cohort study.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- First multicenter real-world analysis of switching to next-generation enzyme replacement therapies in late-onset Pompe disease.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- Re-anchoring the Value of Innovative Therapies in NICE Decision Making When Comparators are Cost Ineffective: A Case Study of Late-Onset Pompe Disease.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Review
- Patient Perspectives on Late-Onset Pompe Disease: Insights From a 2025 Patient Snapshot Survey on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Quality of Life.Journal of patient experience · 2026Article
- Comprehensive review of recent advances in Pompe disease: pathogenesis, management, and future directions.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLate-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) is a rare inherited genetic condition caused by deficiency of acid α-glucosidase (GAA) and accumulation of lysosomal glycogen. LOPD causes progressive muscle dysfunction and damage, leading to significant morbidity and early mortality. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) is the primary treatment for Pompe disease.
methodsA systematic review and network meta-analysis of published evidence on the clinical effectiveness of ERT and best supportive care (BSC) was undertaken to establish the relative effectiveness of ERT compared to BSC (in the absence of ERT). Bibliographic databases were searched to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or any other prospective ERT studies in patients with Pompe disease. Network meta-analyses (NMA) of RCTs were undertaken to estimate indirect treatment effects for forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted and the 6-minute walk test (6MWD). A narrative synthesis was employed to summarise other studies.
resultsA total of 38 studies were included in the review. They comprised three RCTs, three RCT extension studies, seven registry studies and 25 single-group prospective studies. The results of two RCTs were judged to have a high risk of bias. In the NMA, after approximately one year, ERT-naïve patients showed significant 6MWD improvements vs. placebo: ~25 m with alglucosidase alfa and ~ 54 m with avalglucosidase alfa. No significant differences were found for FVC % predicted or comparisons with cipaglucosidase alfa, although very few ERT-naïve patients taking cipaglucosidase alfa were available for the analyses. Intra-ERT comparisons showed a significant 6MWD advantage for avalglucosidase alfa. However, a sensitivity analysis adjusting for skewed data revealed no significant differences. Long-term ERT effectiveness was assessed in single-group studies, showing initial gains maintained for 1-3 years, followed by gradual 10-15-year declines in 6MWD and FVC % predicted. However, small sample sizes and missing data introduce uncertainty.
conclusionsOur NMA results showed that ERTs lead to modest improvements in 6MWD after 1 year compared to placebo in ERT-naive populations. However, there is limited evidence supporting meaningful differences in outcomes between ERTs. There is a lack of longer-term follow-up data supporting the effectiveness of ERTs compared to each other and to best supportive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.