Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40842007›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2025

Insights from LLIN post-distribution monitoring surveys in the malaria transmission foci of the Dominican Republic: implications for quantification and distribution strategies.

Gilda Ventura, María Yinet Santos Félix, Natalia Tejada Bueno, Nicole Michelén Ströfer, Jose Luis Cruz Raposo, Ángel Solís, Rafael German Barrios Parra, Lucía Fernández Montoya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gilda VenturaCentro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis (CECOVEZ), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
María Yinet Santos FélixCentro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis (CECOVEZ), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Natalia Tejada BuenoClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Boston, MA, USA. tejadanatalia282@gmail.com.
Nicole Michelén StröferClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Boston, MA, USA.
Jose Luis Cruz RaposoCentro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis (CECOVEZ), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Ángel SolísCentro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis (CECOVEZ), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Rafael German Barrios ParraClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Boston, MA, USA.
Lucía Fernández MontoyaClinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI), Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-002736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) have been distributed and installed in the Dominican Republic since 2008, and they remain the main vector control intervention used to pursue malaria elimination in the country. However, LLIN performance remains unclear due to a lack of monitoring over the past decade.

methodsA cross-sectional household survey was conducted to monitor LLIN coverage, access, use, physical integrity, washing and drying practices, and the time people go to bed and wake up in the two main malaria foci of the country: Azua (4-6 months post-distribution and installation) and San Juan (one year post-distribution and installation).

resultsThe percentage of sleeping spaces that could be covered with a LLIN given the LLINs present in the household was 64% in Azua and 63% in San Juan; with any net, coverage was 75% in Azua and 80% in San Juan. Reported LLIN retention was 88.4% in Azua and 80.9% in San Juan. The percentage of people who had access to sleeping under an LLIN was 58.8% in Azua and 65.4% in San Juan. Among people with LLIN access (people with enough LLINs to cover all sleeping spaces in their household), use was 48.8% in Azua and 75% in San Juan; and overall, LLINs use was 32.3% in Azua and 50.5% in San Juan. Most LLINs remained in serviceable physical condition (Azua: 96.4%, San Juan: 88.9%) but those with holes were not repaired. Most LLINs were washed with aggressive products (Azua: 65%, San Juan: 86%), at a frequency that suggests they will be washed more than twenty times in three years (Azua: 52%, San Juan: 73%), and dried under the sun (Azua: 75%, San Juan: 90%).

conclusionPoor washing and drying practices are prevalent in both areas, low LLIN use was observed in Azua and some LLIN coverage gaps were measured in both foci. Urgent behavioural change strategies are needed to improve LLIN care in both foci and to increase LLIN use in Azua, alongside revisions to LLIN quantification methods to ensure full coverage of all sleeping spaces in use during installation. Heterogeneities in LLINs use across foci suggest the need for monitoring use in each distribution area to identify individual gaps and promptly address them.

Indexed as

Insecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMosquito ControlAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDominican RepublicFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultLLINsMalaria eliminationMonitoring

Identifiers

PMID40842007
PMCPMC12369129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.