Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841980›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Pumping and hygiene practices are associated with bacterial load and microbial composition in human milk expressed at home.

Sarah M Reyes, Dainelle L Allen, Janet E Williams, Mark A McGuire, Michelle K McGuire, Kathleen M Rasmussen, Anthony G Hay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah M ReyesDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. smreyesphd@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-4338
Dainelle L AllenDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Janet E WilliamsDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Mark A McGuireDepartment of Animal, Veterinary and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Michelle K McGuireMargaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, USA.
Kathleen M RasmussenDivision of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Anthony G HayDepartment of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Funding

NUTRITION TRAININGT32DK007158 · NIDDK · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI PATRICIA A CASSANO, Julia L. Finkelstein · 1986 to 2026
$7.4M
Genomics Resources Core (GRC)P30GM103324 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO · PI FORNEY, LARRY J · 2013 to 2017
$5.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007158NIDDK NIH HHS T32-DK007158NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM103324USDA/Hatch NYC-399346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk (HM) harbors a unique microbiome that contributes to the development of the infant gastrointestinal microbiome and influences long-term health outcomes. While pumping and bottle-feeding HM are increasingly common, doing so may introduce exogenous bacteria, altering this microbial community. The extent to which real-world pumping and hygiene practices alter the HM microbial community remains inadequately characterized.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of 104 paired milk samples from 52 healthy women to investigate the associations between at-home pump hygiene practices and the HM microbiota. We compared samples expressed with personal equipment, allowing women to follow their typical practices, noting variations in breast pump types (closed- vs. open-systems), pre-pumping handwashing, and collection kit cleaning practices (OWN). Milk was also expressed with hospital-grade pump with new, commercially sterilized equipment kits under study-controlled conditions (STER) to serve as a control representing each woman's own unaltered milk microbiota. Microbiota composition was characterized using aerobic culture and 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

resultsAmong OWN milk samples, personal breast pump type had little impact on the HM microbiota. Pre-pumping handwashing, practiced by only 22% of participants, was associated with lower bacterial counts. Compared to samples expressed with handwashed kits, those expressed using home-sterilized kits yielded fewer total and gram-negative bacterial counts, and lower relative abundances of Proteobacteria. The microbiota of OWN milk samples expressed with home-sterilized kits more closely resembled STER samples even in the absence of pre-pumping handwashing (R

conclusionsAt-home hygiene practices, particularly collection kit cleaning methods, substantially influence the HM microbiota. Home sterilization of collection kits may minimize changes to the HM microbiota during expression. These findings support evidence-based recommendations for hygienic pumping practices and underscore the need for further research on the health implications (if any) of pumping-dependent variations in the HM microbiota on infant health.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadBreast Milk ExpressionHygieneMilk, HumanAdultBacteriaFemaleHumansMicrobiotaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SYoung AdultRNA, Ribosomal, 16SBacterial countsBreastmilk expression/methodsGram-negative bacteriaHuman milkMicrobiomeProteobacteria

Identifiers

PMID40841980
PMCPMC12372358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.