Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841969›Full record

SynthesisJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2025

Ethnobotanical uses of plants in Nigeria: an analysis of current research trends and patterns.

Basirat O Rafiu, Abiodun O Omotayo, Ibraheem O Lawal, Adeyemi O Aremu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Basirat O RafiuIndigenous Knowledge Systems Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho, 2790, South Africa.
Abiodun O OmotayoFood Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho, 2790, South Africa.
Ibraheem O LawalIndigenous Knowledge Systems Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho, 2790, South Africa.
Adeyemi O AremuIndigenous Knowledge Systems Centre, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Private Bag X2046, Mmabatho, 2790, South Africa. Oladapo.Aremu@nwu.ac.za.

Funding

National Research Foundation, South Africa KIC230820144560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ethnobotanical landscape in Nigeria reflects a complex interplay of biodiversity, cultural traditions, and health practices deeply rooted in indigenous knowledge. However, the fragmented body of knowledge in the existing limited inventory poses a threat to the loss of these plants and the associated indigenous knowledge. This review examined the historical and cultural uses of plants, as well as their long-term utilisation patterns.

methodsUsing a systematic search, the Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions were explored to gather ethnobotanical literature on utilisation of plants in Nigeria from 1964 to 2024. In addition, bibliometric tools were applied to establish the research trends and patterns.

resultsFrom the 79 eligible studies, we collated 963 plants across 144 families (dominated by Fabaceae with 127 plants) utilised in seven categories namely medicinal/healthcare, spiritual, cosmetics, biopesticides, poison, timber, and fuelwood. An estimated 11% (103) of the 963 plants were classified as popular, with mentions ranging from 11 to 42 times, and the three top cited plants were Carica papaya (42), Vernonia amygdalina (42) and Mangifera indica (41). Most of the identified notable plants (e.g., Azadirachta indica, Carica papaya, Mangifera indica, and Vernonia amygdalina) had significant geographic and cultural relevance. The spiritual, medicinal, and socio-economic roles of these plants were intricately influenced by ethnic identities, ecological zones, and religious beliefs. Cross-regional and cross-cultural analyses revealed that the Southwest and Northeast regions accounted for the highest (70.98%) and lowest (10.28%) prevalence of plant use in Nigeria. Generally, plant utilisation patterns varied across regions, with certain shared uses identified thereby highlighting inter-ethnic connections, while others revealed localised traditions. We identified 19 plants (e.g., Azadirachta indica, Mangifera indica, Vachellia nilotica and Ximenia americana) that were common to the six regions in Nigeria. Bibliometric analysis revealed that the evolution of plant research in Nigeria, from traditional knowledge to more specialised molecular and applied research methodologies. We defined three distinct timelines associated with ethnobotany in Nigeria entailing the initial phase associated with the fundamental period (1964-1989), expansion and growth with shifting focus in research (1990-2009) which was followed by the modernisation and integration (2010-2024).

conclusionEthnobotanical research in Nigeria remains active, reflecting the extensive uses of plants to meet the daily needs of local communities. Nonetheless, challenges persist, including insufficient documentation of indigenous practices, limited collaboration, instances of non-adherence to best practices in ethnobotanical surveys. Addressing these challenges is crucial for the sustainable management of the ethnobotanical heritage in Nigeria.

Indexed as

EthnobotanyMedicine, African TraditionalPlants, MedicinalHumansNigeriaPhytotherapyAgro-ecologyBiodiversityConservationFabaceaeHealthcareIndigenous knowledge

Identifiers

PMID40841969
PMCPMC12369106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.