Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841951›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025

A novel comprehensive strategy for research on wine-processed mechanism of corni fructus guided by variation in the chemical components and network analysis.

Shilin Sun, Yuping Chen, Yu Zhang, Yukun Niu, Mengxin Yang, Xinming Jia, Yiqin Song, Qingwei Dong, Xin Qi, Jiahui Ma and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shilin Sun *Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Respiratory and Digestive Diseases, Baoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.
Yuping Chen *Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Respiratory and Digestive Diseases, Baoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.
Yu Zhang *Key Laboratory of Clinical Research on Respiratory and Digestive Diseases, Baoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.
Yukun NiuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, P. R. China.
Mengxin YangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, P. R. China.
Xinming JiaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, P. R. China.
Yiqin SongKey Laboratory of Clinical Research on Respiratory and Digestive Diseases, Baoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.
Qingwei DongKey Laboratory of Clinical Research on Respiratory and Digestive Diseases, Baoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.
Xin QiKey Laboratory of Clinical Research on Respiratory and Digestive Diseases, Baoding Hospital of Beijing Children's Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Hebei, 071000, P. R. China.
Jiahui MaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, P. R. China.
Qian ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, P. R. China.
Yiran JinThe Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, Hebei, P. R. China. jinyiran@sohu.com.
Yingfeng DuDepartment of Pharmaceutical Analysis, School of Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University, 361 East Zhongshan Road, Shijiazhuang, 050017, Hebei, P. R. China. 17700941@hebmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Baoding City Science and Technology Plan Project No. 2372P006Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province No. 22372407DNatural Science Foundation of Hebei Province No. H2022206384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorni Fructus, a plant with both medicinal and edible properties, is renowned for its aromatic flavor and hepatoprotective and renoprotective effects, offering significant nutritional value and broad application potential. Wine-processed Corni Fructus (WCF) is a primary processed form of Corni Fructus, widely utilized in food supplements. Traditional Chinese medicine suggests that wine-processing enhances its hepatoprotective and renoprotective properties, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

objectiveIn this study, a novel comprehensive strategy guided by variation in the chemical components and differences in biological activities was developed to explore the wine-processing mechanisms. MATERIALS AND

methodsFirstly, the chemical constituents in vitro and in vivo were identified by liquid chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Furthermore, chemometric analysis was applied to investigate the chemical characteristics in the samples with different processing methods. The possible molecular mechanism differences were unraveled by network pharmacology.

resultsA total of 53 and 61 components were identified in vitro of crude Corni Fructus (CCF) and WCF, respectively. In addition, 39 and 43 components were detected in rats' serum after CCF and WCF administered by gavage. Ten common targets were identified as key targets for the therapeutic effects of CCF and WCF on Chronic kidney diseases (CKD). The network analysis showed that 23 components in WCF may be the active substances that make it more effective than CCF for treating CKD.

conclusionsThis study provides a theoretical basis for the pharmacological substances of WCF and CCF and gives insights into comparing their pharmacological differences. It further investigates the mechanisms underlying different processing techniques of Corni Fructus, supporting further exploration of its potential in CKD management. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

CornusDrugs, Chinese HerbalWineAnimalsChromatography, LiquidMaleMass SpectrometryNetwork PharmacologyRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyDrugs, Chinese HerbalBiological activity differencesChemical constituentsCorni fructusKidney diseasesProcessing mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID40841951
PMCPMC12369163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.