ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Triage of road injury casualties - the role of bystanders: a scoping review.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of transportation methods on pediatric and adolescent severely injured vehicle occupants.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Article
- The diamond minutes: rethinking the earliest link of the trauma chain of survival.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Trends in the burden of road traffic injuries among children and adolescents aged 0-19 years in low- and middle-income countries, 1990-2023.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- On-scene predictors of injury severity, deterioration, and death following road injury: a systematic scoping review of information available to responders and its use in triage tools.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBystanders have the potential to be a critical component of the Road Injury Chain of Survival, particularly in the early phases of injury recognition, scene assessment, and emergency service activation. Their potential role in trauma triage remains underexplored. This scoping review aims to examine the existing evidence of the use of bystanders in triage-both laypersons and non-clinical professionals-during the prehospital phase of road injury and other trauma scenarios.
methodsA systematic search was undertaken across MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Psychology & Behavioural Sciences Collection using the EBSCO Host platform, with supplementary hand searches via Google Scholar and reference screening. Articles were included if they addressed triage by lay or professional bystanders (e.g. police, fire and rescue) in prehospital trauma settings. Data were extracted and synthesised using a descriptive analytical approach.
resultsTwenty-three studies were included. Bystanders demonstrated the ability to apply basic triage tools with moderate accuracy, although over-triage was common and under-triage rates often exceeded accepted thresholds. Several trauma training programmes in low-resource settings included triage components, leading to improvements in knowledge and confidence. Long-term retention and real-world clinical utility remain uncertain. Only one study directly evaluated bystander assessment of crash parameters; lay performance approached that of health professionals in some domains. Technological innovations such as video live-streaming from bystanders to emergency call handlers showed potential to enhance triage and situational awareness, though operational and ethical barriers remain.
conclusionsBystanders may have an expanded role in the triage and early assessment of trauma casualties, particularly in settings where formal EMS is limited or delayed. Within the Road Injury Chain of Survival, empowering bystanders through structured training and technology-enabled support could strengthen early links in the chain. Future research should focus on validating simplified triage approaches, evaluating training impact, and assessing outcomes related to both patient care and system efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.