Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841948›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025

Triage of road injury casualties - the role of bystanders: a scoping review.

George Stephen Russam, Jake Gluyas-Harris, Nicholas Aveyard, Tim Nutbeam

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The diamond minutes: rethinking the earliest link of the trauma chain of survival.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

George Stephen RussamAnaesthetic Department, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK. george.russam@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7008-7061
Jake Gluyas-HarrisEmergency Department, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6780-6952
Nicholas AveyardRoyal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-7582
Tim NutbeamIMPACT, Centre for Post-Collision Research Innovation and Translation, Exeter, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0814-9240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBystanders have the potential to be a critical component of the Road Injury Chain of Survival, particularly in the early phases of injury recognition, scene assessment, and emergency service activation. Their potential role in trauma triage remains underexplored. This scoping review aims to examine the existing evidence of the use of bystanders in triage-both laypersons and non-clinical professionals-during the prehospital phase of road injury and other trauma scenarios.

methodsA systematic search was undertaken across MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Psychology & Behavioural Sciences Collection using the EBSCO Host platform, with supplementary hand searches via Google Scholar and reference screening. Articles were included if they addressed triage by lay or professional bystanders (e.g. police, fire and rescue) in prehospital trauma settings. Data were extracted and synthesised using a descriptive analytical approach.

resultsTwenty-three studies were included. Bystanders demonstrated the ability to apply basic triage tools with moderate accuracy, although over-triage was common and under-triage rates often exceeded accepted thresholds. Several trauma training programmes in low-resource settings included triage components, leading to improvements in knowledge and confidence. Long-term retention and real-world clinical utility remain uncertain. Only one study directly evaluated bystander assessment of crash parameters; lay performance approached that of health professionals in some domains. Technological innovations such as video live-streaming from bystanders to emergency call handlers showed potential to enhance triage and situational awareness, though operational and ethical barriers remain.

conclusionsBystanders may have an expanded role in the triage and early assessment of trauma casualties, particularly in settings where formal EMS is limited or delayed. Within the Road Injury Chain of Survival, empowering bystanders through structured training and technology-enabled support could strengthen early links in the chain. Future research should focus on validating simplified triage approaches, evaluating training impact, and assessing outcomes related to both patient care and system efficiency.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficEmergency Medical ServicesHelping BehaviorTriageWounds and InjuriesHumansBystanderDispatchLaypersonPrehospitalTraumaTriage

Identifiers

PMID40841948
PMCPMC12369110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.