ArticleScientific reports2025
Thermoeconomic optimization of a hybrid power and cooling facility using waste heat recovery from a marine diesel engine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving energy efficiency and reducing environmental impacts have become essential goals in today's world. Finding ways to utilize waste heat for generating both power and cooling is a meaningful step toward more sustainable energy use and better resource management. In this research, the aim is to enhance the basic efficiency of diesel engines by harnessing the waste heat. By merging the diesel engine cycle with the ORC and the ejector-heat pipe cooling process, we can simultaneously generate power and cooling. This study focuses on tapping into the unused heat from a specific marine diesel engine to produce both power and cooling. The primary motivation is to cut down on fossil fuel usage due to its adverse environmental impact. To put it another way, this research focuses on increasing the base efficiency of diesel engines by recycling waste heat. By systematically integrating the diesel engine cycle with the organic Rankine cycle and the ejector-heat pipe cooling system, we can produce both power and cooling. Ultimately, 2-archive multi-objective cuckoo search algorithm-based optimization (MOCS2arc algorithm) establishes the optimized conceptual design. The system offers an electrical output of 72.01 kW and cooling capabilities of 56.83 kW, achieving an exergy efficiency of 60.4%. Moreover, economic metrics, including the facility's unit cost of the product ($1259/GJ) and annual exergy destruction costs ($386,670), were ascertained. Under the optimization, exergy efficacy and SUCP of 64.9% and $902.21/GJ are achievable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.