ArticleScientific reports2025
Artificial intelligence model for predicting early biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of intensive care unit requirement and in-hospital mortality in Fournier's gangrene: a comparative analysis of conventional statistical and machine learning models.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Versus Conventional Methods for NCCN Risk Stratification in Localized Prostate Cancer (2020-2025): A Systematic Review.Prostate cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains a significant public health concern, with a substantial proportion of patients experiencing biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP). Traditional risk models, such as CAPRA-S, have demonstrated moderate predictive performance, highlighting the need for more accurate tools. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict BCR in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RALP). A retrospective cohort of 1024 (476 BCR+ and 548 BCR-) patients was analyzed, using a balanced dataset of 25 clinical and pathological variables. Five ML classifiers were evaluated, with XGBoost emerging as the best-performing model, achieving 84% accuracy and an AUC of 0.91. Model validation on an independent dataset of 96 patients confirmed its robustness, with an AUC of 0.89. Decision and calibration curves demonstrated the superior clinical applicability of XGBoost compared to CAPRA-S, indicating improved risk stratification and potential to optimize treatment decisions. The study underscores the value of ML in refining prognosis prediction and guiding therapeutic strategies in prostate cancer. While further validation in diverse clinical settings is necessary, these findings support the integration of ML-based models into clinical decision-making to enhance personalized patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.