ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2025
Assessment of a microhaplotype panel for human identification and ancestry inference in Brazil.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Evaluation of a Novel Microhaplotype Panel for DNA Mixture and Kinship Analysis.Electrophoresis · 2026Article
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microhaplotypes (MHs) comprise multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in DNA segments of up to 300 bp in length. These SNP combinations result in numerous allelic variations (i.e., haplotypes). They are an emerging type of genetic marker with the potential to be an alternative to Short Tandem Repeats (STRs), Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), and Insertion/deletion polymorphisms (InDels) in population genetic studies and forensic cases involving degraded DNA or mixed contributors. This study is the first to evaluate a microhaplotype panel in an admixed Brazilian population. We assessed 130 MH markers in 344 individuals from Ribeirão Preto (State of São Paulo, Brazil) regarding their human identification and ancestry prediction application. DNA was extracted, and samples were genotyped using the Infinium Multi-Ethnic Global-8 array (MEGA) Kit (Illumina). The Sanger and Michigan imputation tools inferred SNPs missing in the MEGA assay. The linkage disequilibrium analysis indicated that 108 out of the 128 microhaplotypes behave independently at a population level, and the combined match probability for these 108 MHs was 4.4 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
40841788What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.