Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841778›Full record

ArticleHeredity2025

Quantifying genetic and genotypic gain gaps in Eucalyptus: the hidden cost of ignoring inbreeding and dominance.

Marcio J Araujo, David Bush, Evandro V Tambarussi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcio J Araujo *AbacusBio, Ground Floor, Public Trust Building, Dunedin, New Zealand. marcio_ok66@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7218-3879
David BushCSIRO Australian Tree Seed Centre, GPO Box 1700, 2600, Canberra, Australia.
Evandro V Tambarussi *Department of Plant Production, São Paulo State University (FCA/Unesp), Avenida Universitária, 3780, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9478-5379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mating system of Eucalyptus species is necessary to accurately estimate genetic parameters and improve breeding programs. Eucalyptus species often exhibit mixed mating systems, leading to complex relationships among progenies. Traditional tree breeding programs that assume a half-sibling relationship for open-pollinated (OP) trials may overestimate genetic gains by neglecting the effects of inbreeding and dominance. This study focuses on Eucalyptus pellita, a species with a mixed mating system, to quantify the impact of selfing and dominance on breeding strategies. We simulated OP trial growth data for 100 randomly selected families in a randomized complete block design, using published estimated parameters for diameter at breast height (DBH). Our analysis indicated that marker-based models, particularly those incorporating dominance effects, provide more accurate genetic parameter estimates and larger predicted genetic gains than pedigree-based models. These results reveal pronounced genetic and genotypic gain gaps when traditional models are employed, underscoring the imperative for integrating dominance-informed genomic selection strategies. Thus, our study provides essential guidance for optimizing breeding programs to sustainably enhance productivity and genetic quality in Eucalyptus plantations.

Indexed as

EucalyptusGenes, DominantInbreedingGenotypeModels, GeneticPlant BreedingPollination

Identifiers

PMID40841778
PMCPMC12457597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.