ArticleHeredity2025
Quantifying genetic and genotypic gain gaps in Eucalyptus: the hidden cost of ignoring inbreeding and dominance.
Article in Heredity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seasonal Variation and Genetic Evaluation of Needle Catechin Content in Half-Sib Families ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the mating system of Eucalyptus species is necessary to accurately estimate genetic parameters and improve breeding programs. Eucalyptus species often exhibit mixed mating systems, leading to complex relationships among progenies. Traditional tree breeding programs that assume a half-sibling relationship for open-pollinated (OP) trials may overestimate genetic gains by neglecting the effects of inbreeding and dominance. This study focuses on Eucalyptus pellita, a species with a mixed mating system, to quantify the impact of selfing and dominance on breeding strategies. We simulated OP trial growth data for 100 randomly selected families in a randomized complete block design, using published estimated parameters for diameter at breast height (DBH). Our analysis indicated that marker-based models, particularly those incorporating dominance effects, provide more accurate genetic parameter estimates and larger predicted genetic gains than pedigree-based models. These results reveal pronounced genetic and genotypic gain gaps when traditional models are employed, underscoring the imperative for integrating dominance-informed genomic selection strategies. Thus, our study provides essential guidance for optimizing breeding programs to sustainably enhance productivity and genetic quality in Eucalyptus plantations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.