ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimization of clayey soil parameters with aeolian sand through response surface methodology and a desirability function.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transforming ceramic residues into circular economy solutions in geotechnical engineering.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Data-driven optimization and pressuremeter modulus prediction using response surface methodology for smarter geotechnical design.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Experimental and statistical analysis of the block orientation effect on the mechanical behaviour of bimrocks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancing the mechanical properties of naturally weak clayey soils is crucial in geotechnical engineering and is often achieved through targeted stabilization techniques. This research focuses on reinforcing clayey soil by integrating inert material, specifically aeolian sand collected from roadside deposits, in varying proportions from 2.5 to 30%. An experimental approach is adopted to analyze the improvement in geotechnical properties resulting from the addition of aeolian sand to clay through a series of geotechnical tests. These tests include the methylene blue test (MBV), the determination of Atterberg limits (LL, PL, PI), compaction characteristics (MDD and OMC), direct shear testing (C and ϕ), and oedometer tests (Cc and Cs). Furthermore, an optimization approach based on response surface methodology (RSM) and a central composite design (CCD) is implemented to determine the optimal mixture composition and accurately predict the evolution of the geotechnical properties of the soil. The experimental findings demonstrate significant improvements in the mechanical characteristics of the soil following the incorporation of aeolian sand, with the best performance achieved at a 30% sand content. The MBV decreased by 34.98%, the LL decreased by 39.62%, the PL decreased by 37.50%, and the PI decreased by 45.45%. In contrast, the MDD increased by 12.25%, enhancing the compaction and load-bearing capacity of the soil. A reduction of approximately 7.59% in the OMC was observed, lowering the water demand. The internal friction angle (ϕ) increased significantly by up to 233.33%, improving the shear strength, whereas the cohesion decreased by 49.78%. Additionally, the Cc and Cs decreased by 16.15 and 54.45%, respectively, which reduced the sensitivity of the soil to volume changes. Mathematical models are developed and statistically validated using the clay and aeolian sand contents as predictive variables, while key parameters such as the maximum dry density (MDD), cohesion (C), internal friction angle (ϕ), compressibility coefficient (Cc), and swelling coefficient (Cs) serve as response metrics. By applying analysis of variance (ANOVA) and refining the quadratic model via RSM, the study demonstrated significant results, with a coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.