ArticleScientific reports2025
Hearing people speak in different accents biases voice discrimination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Voice discrimination is a fundamentally different task when matching utterances than when matching identity across different words. Discriminating between speakers of different languages makes the task even harder because unfamiliar languages contain different phonemes that are less easily matched. Discriminating between people with different accents may also be difficult as even if the same words are uttered, the phonemes are different. To test this, we created a set of voices using voice cloning that have the same or different identity or accent (UK, Poland, and China) and speaking different phrases. We tested how accent, sentences, and identify affected bias to conflate different identities as the same person. Contrasting identity between different and same increased bias to judge people as the same by about 62%. Contrasting accent between different and same independently increased bias to judge people as the same by about 10%. Contrasting between different and same sentences, changed bias to label people the same more when the accents were different than when they were the same. Our results are consistent with the idea that we are biased to think people typically speak with one accent. Thus, accents affect voice discrimination independently of language familiarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.