Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841727›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Hearing people speak in different accents biases voice discrimination.

Shane C Santos, Aaliyah Kapadia, David R Feinberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shane C SantosDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Aaliyah KapadiaDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada.
David R FeinbergDepartment of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, L8S 4K1, Canada. feinberg@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC DG 2023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voice discrimination is a fundamentally different task when matching utterances than when matching identity across different words. Discriminating between speakers of different languages makes the task even harder because unfamiliar languages contain different phonemes that are less easily matched. Discriminating between people with different accents may also be difficult as even if the same words are uttered, the phonemes are different. To test this, we created a set of voices using voice cloning that have the same or different identity or accent (UK, Poland, and China) and speaking different phrases. We tested how accent, sentences, and identify affected bias to conflate different identities as the same person. Contrasting identity between different and same increased bias to judge people as the same by about 62%. Contrasting accent between different and same independently increased bias to judge people as the same by about 10%. Contrasting between different and same sentences, changed bias to label people the same more when the accents were different than when they were the same. Our results are consistent with the idea that we are biased to think people typically speak with one accent. Thus, accents affect voice discrimination independently of language familiarity.

Indexed as

Speech PerceptionVoiceAdultFemaleHumansLanguageMalePhoneticsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40841727
PMCPMC12371062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.