ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Influence of traditionality and modernity on public breastfeeding behaviors: a theory of planned behavior approach.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast milk is widely recognized as the optimal source of infant nutrition, with the World Health Organization recommending exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months. However, breastfeeding rates remain suboptimal worldwide and in Taiwan. The six-month exclusive breastfeeding rate in Taiwan, defined as the percentage of infants aged six months who received only breast milk and no other foods or liquids in the previous 24 h, declined from 46.2% in 2018 to 37.9% in 2020. One barrier to continued breastfeeding is the discomfort or hesitation some mothers feel when breastfeeding in public. While qualitative research has indicated that conservative values may inhibit public breastfeeding, few quantitative studies have examined the simultaneous influence of traditionality and modernity. This study investigates how traditionality and modernity affect public breastfeeding behavior in Taiwan, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a framework.
methodsA cross-sectional online survey was conducted from 4 to 15 March 2024, recruiting 358 Taiwanese mothers with prior breastfeeding experience via social media. Validated instruments measured traditionality, modernity, TPB constructs (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and intention), and frequency of public breastfeeding. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and structural equation modeling.
resultsTraditionality was negatively associated with attitudes (β = -0.30), perceived control (β = -0.11), intention (β = -0.14), and public breastfeeding behavior (β = -0.14). Modernity indirectly promoted public breastfeeding through positive links with attitudes (β = 0.12), subjective norms (β = 0.23), and perceived control (β = 0.26). Intention strongly predicted behavior (β = 0.60). The model explained 42% of the variance (CFI = 0.99, SRMR = 0.05).
conclusionsThe study confirms that traditionality may hinder public breastfeeding, while modernity enhances it by shaping attitudes, norms, and control beliefs. These findings have important implications for public health policy and practice. Since traditionality and modernity influence behavior through distinct psychological pathways, interventions should be culturally tailored. For mothers with high traditionality, mobilizing family and community support may reinforce positive norms. For those with strong modern values, strategies should focus on autonomy, self-efficacy, and informed decision-making to support breastfeeding in public spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.