ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2025
Influence of time since injury and physical activity level on upper limb kinematics and muscle activation during wheelchair propulsion in complete T12/L1 spinal cord injury.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Cadence Control on Upper-Limb Kinematics and Muscle Activation During Manual Wheelchair Propulsion in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWheelchair propulsion strategies vary widely among individuals with complete spinal cord injury (SCI), yet research typically focuses on differences between injury levels rather than variability within the same level. This study investigated how physical activity (PA) level and time since injury affect wheelchair propulsion biomechanics in individuals with identical T12/L1 SCI classification.
methodsEleven participants with complete T12/L1 SCI performed wheelchair propulsion at maximum and self-selected speeds. Joint kinematics and electromyography data were collected from six upper body muscles. Participants were categorized by time since injury (Short: < 10 years, Medium: 10-25 years, Long: ≥ 25 years) and physical activity level (Low, Moderate, High). Group differences were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-hoc tests.
resultsSignificant differences in propulsion biomechanics were observed despite identical injury levels. Time since injury significantly affected elbow kinematics (p = 0.009) and biceps activity (p = 0.009), with the Long-time group showing increased elbow range of motion during maximum effort compared to the Medium-time group. PA level influenced trunk flexion (p = 0.036) and upper trapezius activity (p = 0.012), with the High-PA group demonstrating greater trunk flexion during maximum effort compared to the Low-PA group. Notably, propulsion velocity showed no significant differences between groups.
conclusionsWheelchair propulsion strategies vary significantly among individuals with identical SCI level, demonstrating that neurological classification alone does not determine movement patterns. The adaptive strategies observed in experienced and physically active wheelchair users suggest rehabilitation approaches should consider these factors beyond injury classification. These findings highlight the importance of promoting long-term PA participation and ongoing biomechanical adaptation throughout the lifespan of individuals with SCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.