ArticleBMC cancer2025
Metformin for the treatment of breast cancer: a scoping review of randomized clinical trials.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploration of body mass index and circulating metabolic factors as predictors of metformin benefit in the Canadian Cancer Trials Group MA.32.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2026Trial
- Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Recurrence in Triple-Positive Breast Cancer (ER+/PR+/HER2+) and Potential Repurposing of Multi-Target Inhibitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Metformin and its derivatives in breast cancer: from glycaemic control to tumor-intrinsic pathways.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metformin has been the focus of substantial interest in the field of oncology. Although breast cancer is the type of cancer where metformin was most extensively studied through randomized clinical trials (RCTs), none of the previous reviews in this field provided a comprehensive overview of the landscape of RCTs taking into account the phenotype of breast cancer, its staging, and treatment modalities. This scoping review sought to comprehensively map the literature of RCTs focusing on the use of metformin in the treatment of breast cancer and followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The eligibility criteria encompassed all RCTs involving metformin for adult patients with breast cancer, with no constraints regarding context, language, publication date, or outcomes. We included 122 reports from 40 RCTs comprising a total of 5,623 participants and 107 distinct outcomes. The results showed that most studies did not present results by phenotype of breast cancer and highlighted critical gaps and opportunities in the literature. Notably, limited evidence from subgroup analyses within a large RCT suggested potential benefits of metformin in improving overall and disease-free survival among HER2 + participants but not among patients with other phenotypes, a result that requires further investigation. Our findings highlight the potential for considerably expanding the current knowledge base in this field through the retrospective determination of participant phenotypes, facilitating cost-effective and time-efficient individual participant data meta-analyses. Furthermore, we recommend that funding agencies and journals mandate the comprehensive presentation of results from RCTs on breast cancer based on phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.