ArticleBMC ophthalmology2025
Intraoperative UBM-guided direct cyclopexy for traumatic cyclodialysis cleft: a four-case series.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Treatment approaches for large traumatic cyclodialysis clefts in phakic eyes: A systematic review and proposal for standardized reporting.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasonic biomicroscopy (UBM)-guided direct cyclopexy for treating traumatic cyclodialysis clefts.
methodsIntraoperative UBM-guided direct cyclopexy was performed on a total of four eyes. Prior to the conjunctival incision, UBM evaluation was facilitated with a self-designed eye cup. Scleral flaps were generated according to their respective locations. Before the scleral flaps and conjunctiva were closed, UBM was used to promptly assess the repositioning status.
results1.UBM-guided direct cyclopexies were performed on four male patients (mean age: 39.7 years). In all instances, the cyclodialysis cleft resulted from blunt ocular trauma, with an average time interval between injury and surgical treatment of 29.5 days. 2. A simple cyclodialysis cleft was observed in two patients. One patient had retinal detachment and subluxation of the lens, and one presented with a shallow anterior chamber, iridodialysis, cataract, vitreous hemorrhage, papilledema, and hypotony maculopathy. 3. Prior to surgery, the mean IOP in all four patients was 7 mmHg (range: 6-9 mmHg), which increased to an average of 16.5 mmHg on postsurgical day three (range: 11-22 mmHg). 4. UBM examination confirmed successful closure of the cleft in all patients.
conclusionDuring the procedure, UBM-guided direct cyclopexies can accurately assess cyclodialysis cleft repair without being affected by the optical clarity of the refractive media. Preliminary findings demonstrate the feasibility of this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.