Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841578›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Positive impact of hydroponics and artificial light on yield and quality of wheat.

Simona Bassu, Sebastian Eichelsbacher, Francesco Giunta, Rosella Motzo, Corinna Dawid, Martina Gastl, Michael Schloter, Katharina A Scherf, Stefan Hör, Yuri Pinheiro Alves De Souza and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Simona BassuChair of Digital Agriculture, Department of Life Science Engineering, HEF World Agricultural Systems Center, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Sebastian EichelsbacherChair of Digital Agriculture, Department of Life Science Engineering, HEF World Agricultural Systems Center, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Francesco GiuntaDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Rosella MotzoDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Corinna DawidTUM School of Life Sciences, Chemosensory Food Systems, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Martina GastlResearch Center Weihenstephan for Brewing and Food Quality, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Michael SchloterResearch Unit Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Katharina A ScherfLeibniz Institute for Food Systems Biology at the Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Stefan HörResearch Center Weihenstephan for Brewing and Food Quality, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Yuri Pinheiro Alves De SouzaResearch Unit Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Stefanie SchulzResearch Unit Comparative Microbiome Analysis, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Timo D StarkTUM School of Life Sciences, Food Chemistry and Molecular Sensory Science, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Volker MohlerBavarian State Research Center for Agriculture, Freising, Germany.
Senthold AssengChair of Digital Agriculture, Department of Life Science Engineering, HEF World Agricultural Systems Center, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany. senthold.asseng@tum.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing crops in controlled-environment indoor farming systems offers new ways of producing high-yield, pesticide-free, environmental-friendly food. However, it replaces soil with hydroponics and the sun with LED lights. Compared with the field, wheat grown indoors showed a much higher yield potential and bread-making quality parameters. Many mineral concentrations were higher due to the unrestricted water supply and nutrients in hydroponics. However, concentrations declined with increasing yields. The microbiome richness inside the grains of wheat grown without soil indoors was still within the range of wheat grown in the field. However, taxa were different among cultivars and treatments. There were differences in the presence of undefined secondary metabolites between indoor and outdoor wheat and across the indoor experiments. Regardless of the growing environment, immunoreactive proteins were present. Indoor-grown wheat had a higher share of ω5-gliadins but lower shares of γ-gliadins and low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits, which may affect the gluten protein immunoreactive potential for individuals with wheat-related disorders (allergy and celiac disease). Growing wheat without soil and sunlight indoors can produce high-yielding, high-quality grains. However, the food quality and health aspects associated with gluten proteins might deteriorate with a further, theoretically possible, yield increase in a controlled growing environment.

Indexed as

HydroponicsLightTriticumAgricultureCrops, AgriculturalGliadinGlutensMicrobiotaSoilSunlightGliadingluteninGlutensSoilGliadinsMetabolitesMicrobiomeNutritional and baking qualityWheatYield

Identifiers

PMID40841578
PMCPMC12370996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.