Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841569›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel and efficient personalized stress detection technique using a deep learning model.

Ulligaddala Srinivasarao, Gopisetty Rathnamma, M Satish Kumar, Lakshmipathi Anantha, Rakesh Kumar Donthi, T Jhansi Rani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ulligaddala SrinivasaraoDepartment of CSE, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Rudraram Village, Hyderabad, India. ulligaddalasrinu@gmail.com.
Gopisetty RathnammaDepartment of CSE, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Rudraram Village, Hyderabad, India.
M Satish KumarNalla Narasimha Reddy Education Society's Group of Institutions, Hyderabad, India.
Lakshmipathi AnanthaVIT-AP University, Amaravathi, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Rakesh Kumar DonthiDepartment of CSE, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Rudraram Village, Hyderabad, India.
T Jhansi RaniDepartment of CSE, GITAM (Deemed to be) University, Rudraram Village, Hyderabad, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stress is a type of mental tension or escalated psycho-physiological state of the human body caused by a problematic situation. It majorly affects adults and elders, which further leads to chronic health problems and heart-related diseases. Various techniques were developed to detect stress levels. Detecting the stress level through tweets is a difficult task. Several techniques were introduced to detect the stress level through text from social media using both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models. Several limitations occurred, such as higher training time, high time consumption, and limited features utilized to train the model. The proposed novelty of the technique is developed to overcome these issues and provide efficient stress detection. The novelty lies in the integration of multiple advanced text representation techniques, such as FastText, Global Vectors for Word Representation (Glove), DeepMoji, and XLNet, with Depth-wise Separable Convolution with Residual Network (DSC-ResNet) for accurate stress detection. The Chaotic Fennec Fox Optimization Algorithm (CFFO) tunes the hyperparameter. The DSC-ResNet model is improved by hybridizing the layer of depthwise separable convolution into the ResNet model. The proposed model is implemented in the Python platform. The overall performance of the proposed technique is analyzed using various related methods to determine its efficiency. The accuracy of the proposed technique is obtained to be 98.42%, which achieves higher performance compared to other associated techniques. The proposed technique's precision, recall, specificity, and F1-score achieve 97.58%, 98.12%, 98.28%, and 98.38%.

Indexed as

Deep LearningStress, PsychologicalAlgorithmsHumansSocial MediaDeepMojiFastTextFox optimizationResidual networkStemmingStress detectionTokenization

Identifiers

PMID40841569
PMCPMC12370911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.