ArticleScientific reports2025
Medicine quality assessment in Nepal using semi randomised sampling and evaluation of a small scale dissolution test and portable Raman spectrometers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Substandard and falsified medicines threaten global health and require reliable data and screening technologies to combat their spread. This study examined the quality of 241 samples containing azithromycin, cefixime, esomeprazole and losartan collected from licenced private vendors in the Saptari (121 samples; convenience sampling) and Kathmandu (120 samples; randomised sampling) districts of Nepal. Nearly 10% (24 samples; 95% CI 6.5-14.5) of samples failed pharmacopoeial quality analysis and were classified as 'substandard' or 'probably substandard'. No falsified medicines were identified. Small-scale dissolution acceptance criteria were applied to all 20 three-unit combinations of 213 samples tested in the first stage of the United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution test. Approximately 1% of these results were false positives when compared with the final United States Pharmacopoeia dissolution test results, suggesting the test's usefulness in encouraging dissolution testing in resource-limited contexts. In the narrow sense of presence/absence, two portable Raman spectrometers reliably detected azithromycin, cefixime and losartan in most samples based on effective methods for detecting falsified medicines; however, none of the substandard samples were identified. The findings suggest that falsified medicines are less prevalent in Nepal and the surrounding region than suggested by regional concerns about Nepal and global concerns about low- and middle-income countries. Nevertheless, the Nepalese government should continue to ensure the quality of all distributed medicines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.