ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Machine Learning in Tuberculosis Research: A Global Bibliometric Analysis of Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Drug Discovery Trends.
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesTuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health challenge, driving the need for innovative approaches in diagnosis and drug development. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly machine learning (ML), has enabled significant advancements in areas such as drug resistance prediction, radiomics, prognostic modeling, and computational drug discovery. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global research on machine learning and tuberculosis (MLTB), highlighting trends relevant to therapeutic innovation and regulatory science.
methodsA structured search of the Scopus database was conducted for English-language, data-driven publications on MLTB through May 1, 2024. Bibliometric indicators were analyzed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer, focusing on publication trends, citation metrics, collaboration networks, and thematic clustering.
resultsThe MLTB research field has grown rapidly, with an average annual growth rate of 22.12% between 2000 and 2024. Publications averaged 21.64 citations, and 40.11% involved international collaboration. Twelve major clusters were identified, including deep learning, drug discovery, bioinformatics, docking, random forest, and latent TB infection-highlighting the field's expanding scope in drug development and diagnostic applications.
conclusionMLTB research is evolving rapidly, driven by interdisciplinary collaboration and AI innovation. These findings offer insights for guiding future AI-enabled TB therapeutic strategies and aligning research efforts with regulatory and translational priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40841498What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.