ArticleNature chemical biology2025
Site-selective protein editing by backbone extension acyl rearrangements.
Article in Nature chemical biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical Biology 2025: Highlights From the Ch/Bi145 Course at Caltech.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
- Engineering Protease-Resistant Peptides via Non-Canonical Amino Acids: Design Strategies and Biosynthetic Advances.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Versatile Strategy for Head-to-Tail Macrocyclization and Traceless Backbone Editing of Short Peptides.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Co-Translational Incorporation ofJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Protein and polypeptide heteropolymers containing non-α-backbone monomers are highly desirable as potential materials and therapeutics but many remain difficult or impossible to biosynthesize in cells using traditional genetic code expansion. Here we describe a next-generation approach to such materials that relies instead on proximity-guided intramolecular rearrangements that edit the protein backbone post-translationally. This approach relies on orthogonal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes that accept α-hydroxy acid monomers whose side chains contain masked nucleophiles. Introduction of such an α-hydroxy acid into a protein translated in vivo, followed by nucleophile unmasking, sets up a thermodynamically favored intramolecular backbone extension acyl rearrangement (BEAR) reaction that edits the protein to install an extended-backbone monomer. In the examples described here, BEAR reactions are used to generate protein heteropolymers containing a β-backbone, γ-backbone or δ-backbone. This report represents a general strategy to install extended backbones into genetically encoded proteins and peptides expressed in cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40841495What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.