ArticleDiscover oncology2025
Identification of RNA binding protein genes associated with colorectal cancer by bioinformatics analysis.
Article in Discover oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a prevalent malignant neoplasm on a global scale, with tumor heterogeneity driving therapeutic resistance and poor prognosis. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which are involved in regulating post-transcriptional processes, are becoming more recognized for their involvement in the advancement of cancer. This research conducted a thorough examination of the prognostic and functional significance of RBP-related gene sets (RBPGs) in CRC by utilizing transcriptomic data from the cancer genome atlas (TCGA). Differential expression analysis identified 406 RBPGs (268 upregulated, 138 downregulated) in CRC. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) network analysis revealed key modules involving 394 nodes, highlighting their functional interconnectivity. A prognostic model was constructed using 8 RBPGs (GTPBP4, KPNA2, CTNNA1, RRS1, SLFN11, CDKN2A, CHD3, TRAP1). This model effectively stratifies patients into 2 risk categories, each associated with differing survival outcomes. The model demonstrated robust predictive accuracy and was validated through subgroup analyses, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, principal component analysis (PCA), and consistency index (C-index) curves. Integrating risk score, stage, and age, a nomogram was established to further enhance clinical applicability. Enrichment analysis linked high-risk groups to extracellular matrix remodeling, PI3K-Akt signaling, and immune evasion, while low-risk groups exhibited metabolic and immune activation pathways. Analysis of the tumor microenvironment (TME) indicated that high-risk patients exhibited elevated stromal and immune scores, alongside reduced tumor purity, which is associated with more aggressive phenotypic characteristics. Although tumor mutation burden (TMB) did not differ between risk groups, high TMB correlated with poorer survival. High-risk patients showed elevated tumor immune dysfunction and exclusion (TIDE) score and increased sensitivity to oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, and targeted therapies. In addition, we further experimentally verified the expression of the hub gene in the tissues of colorectal cancer patients. This study establishes RBP-based prognostic signatures, elucidates their mechanistic roles in CRC progression, and identifies potential therapeutic targets, providing a framework for personalized CRC management. Further validation in multicenter cohorts is warranted to translate findings into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.