ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Redefining Biventricular Repair Feasibility in Prenatal Counseling: A Review of Fetal Echocardiograms in Patients Selected for Complex Biventricular Repair.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical advances have recently expanded the boundaries of feasibility for biventricular repair (BVR) in patients with complex congenital heart disease (CHD). In particular, diagnoses historically considered prohibitive for BVR-such as unbalanced atrioventricular septal defects (uAVSD), double-outlet right ventricles (DORV) with remote ventricular septal defects (VSD), atrioventricular valve straddle (AVVS), and heterotaxy-are now increasingly being managed with successful two-ventricle strategies. To determine whether fetal echocardiographic features once viewed as contraindications to BVR remain valid in the current surgical era, we retrospectively reviewed all patients evaluated by our institutional BVR committee from June 2023 to February 2025 with prenatally diagnosed uAVSD, DORV, or DORV-AVSD. Among the 23 patients selected for BVR, 16 had available fetal echocardiograms. Features historically associated with poor BVR candidacy were common, including RV outflow tract obstruction (56%), ventricular hypoplasia (44%), heterotaxy (25%), AVVS (13%), remote VSDs (25%), and pulmonary venous anomalies (19%). Despite these findings, all patients were managed with BVR strategies, with the majority achieving complete or staged biventricular circulation at the time of publication. Notably, patients deemed unsuitable for BVR were significantly older at time of referral, highlighting the potential role of fetal cardiology in early identification and timely referral. These findings suggest that many prenatal features long considered exclusionary are no longer barriers to BVR, underscoring the need to modernize fetal counseling frameworks, reflecting contemporary surgical capabilities. As the landscape evolves, fetal cardiologists must adapt their counseling strategies to offer families accurate prognostic information and renewed hope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.