Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841433›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2025

Care of neonates following in-utero growth restriction: A prospective cohort study exploring neonatal morbidity.

M G Alda, A G Wood, T MacDonald, J K Charlton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M G AldaDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. malda@mercy.com.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1741-1944
A G WoodSchool of Psychology, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
T MacDonaldDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9099-7745
J K CharltonDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study compared neonatal morbidities in Small-for-Gestational-Age (SGA) preterm infants to gestation- and birthweight-matched controls.

methodsProspective cohort study conducted on preterm infants born between 24

resultsAmong 148 preterm infants (54 SGA, 54 in each control group). SGA infants had higher rates of hypothermia, necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), and hypoglycaemia compared to controls. Intraventricular haemorrhage was more prevalent in birthweight-matched controls. SGA infants regained birthweight faster (day 8 vs. day 11, p < 0.0002). No significant differences were found in length of stay or respiratory support.

conclusionSGA is an independent risk factor for hypothermia, NEC, and hypoglycaemia, beyond the risks incurred by being born preterm but well-grown for gestation.

Indexed as

Enterocolitis, NecrotizingFetal Growth RetardationHypoglycemiaHypothermiaInfant, Premature, DiseasesInfant, Small for Gestational AgeAustraliaBirth WeightCase-Control StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMale

Identifiers

PMID40841433
PMCPMC12431843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.