ArticleScientific reports2025
B1 corrected T1 mapping in the differentiation and prediction of breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the effect of B1-corrected T1 mapping on the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions and the prediction of biological characteristics in breast carcinoma. 364 patients with breast lesions were included. T1 maps were acquired with multi-flip angle imaging sequences before and after contrast enhancement. T1 values before (T1max, T1mean, T1min) and after enhancement (T1maxce, T1meance, T1mince) were measured. Difference in T1 (ΔT1), percentage reduction in T1(ΔT1%) and contrast-enhanced T1 ratio (T1mean/T1meance) were calculated. The differences in T1 values before and after enhancement between benign and malignant breast lesions were compared. Prediction models were constructed with clinical imaging data. The diagnostic efficiency of the prediction models was compared using ROC. DeLong test was used to compare the AUC of the models. Univariate analysis showed that T1mean, T1max, T1meance, T1mince, ΔT1, ΔT1%, T1mean/T1meance, maximum lesion diameter, age, and BI-RADS classification were statistical significance (p < 0.05) between benign and malignant lesions. Multivariate analysis showed that ΔT1%, age, and BI-RADS classification were independent risk factors. Model 1( ΔT1%, age, and BI-RADS classification) demonstrated superior diagnostic performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, with the AUC of 0.952 (95% CI: 0.926-0.977). B1-corrected T1 mapping has good clinical value for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.