ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance of deep learning models for the classification and object detection of different oral white lesions using photographic images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated deep learning detection of orthodontically induced external apical root resorption in maxillary incisors on panoramic radiographs.Progress in orthodontics · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computer vision adjunctive technology for oral lesion diagnoses has been developed to detect and identify Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders (OPMDs) and non-OPMDs. The early detection of OPMDs can reduce the risk of oral cancer development, improving the survival rate of the patients. This study aims to evaluate the computer vision technique in the white oral lesion domain within the scope of photographic images. Deep learning techniques for the classification of Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) and transformer neural networks, and one-stage models of YOLOv7 and YOLOv8 were utilized to classify and detect five classes of OPMDs and non-OPMDs oral white lesions including oral leukoplakia, oral lichen planus, pseudomembranous candidiasis, oral ulcers covered with pseudomembrane and other white benign oral lesions. From the evaluation results of classification, the IFormerBase model achieves overperformance compared to CNN models with accuracy, precision, and F1 score of more than 80% on the test set. The best model for object detection is YOLOv7 with 84.5% mean Average Precision (mAP) at Intersection over Union (IoU) threshold of 0.3 and 74.5% at IoU of 0.5 on the test set. Object detection results reveal promising automatic oral lesion identification, which can be further developed to enhance the lesion screening system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.