ArticleScientific reports2025
Two-year results of switching to intravitreal administration of faricimab in patients with aflibercept-refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-year real-world outcomes of faricimab in pretreated eyes with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- A novel Tie2xVEGF bispecific antibody fusion demonstrates enhanced therapeutic efficacy through direct Tie2 activation and VEGF neutralization.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Twelve-month lesion reactivation after initial loading injections of faricimab in neovascular AMD: a comparison between three and four loading injections.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Real-World Outcomes and Choroidal Vascular Structural Changes After Switching to Faricimab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- One-year results of the intravitreal administration of faricimab in patients with naïve type 3 macular neovascularization.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Two-Year Real-World Outcomes of Faricimab in Treatment-Resistant Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the efficacy of switching to intravitreal injection of faricimab (IVF) in patients with aflibercept-refractory neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) over 2 years of follow-up. We retrospectively reviewed 47 consecutive eyes of 45 Japanese patients with nAMD who switched from aflibercept to faricimab. Thirty-one eyes of 30 Japanese patients were included in this study. The mean visual acuity (BCVA) at month 24 was stable relative to the baseline. The mean central retinal thickness and subfoveal choroidal thinning significantly decreased at 24 months (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001, respectively). At 24 months, 22 eyes (70.0%) achieved a dry macula and had improved VA levels with an improvement of 0.80 lines, which was significantly different from the remaining 9 eyes (P < 0.01). The mean interval of IVF was 11.8 weeks, which was significantly longer than that of aflibercept (10.0 weeks) at baseline (p = 0.014). Progression of macular atrophy or newly developing macular atrophy was seen in 3 eyes (9.7%), showing decline of 1.0 line, no other complications were seen. These results indicate that switching to IVF stabilized VA, significantly improved the anatomical changes and the achievement of a dry macula was significantly associated with the visual outcome, in patients with aflibercept-refractory nAMD over a 24-month period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.