ArticleNature communications2025
Multi-scale and multi-context interpretable mapping of cell states across heterogeneous spatial samples.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Multi-scale and multi-context interpretable mapping of cell states across heterogeneous spatial samples.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There is a growing demand for methods that can effectively align and compare spatial data in the absence of obvious visual correspondence. To address this challenge, we developed an interpretable cell mapping strategy based on solving a Linear Assignment Problem (LAP) where the total cost is computed by considering cells and their niches. We demonstrate that our approach outperforms other methods at capturing the spatial context of cells in synthetic and real data sets. The flexibility of our implementation enhances the interpretability of mapping and allows for accurate cell mapping across samples, technologies, resolutions, developmental and regenerative time. We show spatiotemporal decoupling of cells during development and patient level sub-populations in In Situ Mass Cytometry (IMC) cancer data sets. Our interpretable mapping approach facilitates systemic comparison and analysis of heterogeneous spatial data. We provide a flexible framework for researchers to tailor their analysis to the specific biological and research context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.