ArticleAnnals of medicine2025
Deep learning model for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on H&E-stained biopsy digital images.
Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging machine learning for accurate forecasting of pulmonary tuberculosis epidemics in a coastal city in China.Tropical medicine and health · 2026Article
- AI-driven precision diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer: a narrative review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Versus Conventional Methods for NCCN Risk Stratification in Localized Prostate Cancer (2020-2025): A Systematic Review.Prostate cancer · 2026Review
- Whole-mount histopathology as spatial ground truth for artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: a structured narrative review of techniques, models, and translational gaps.American journal of clinical and experimental urology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo develop and validate a deep learning pipeline using prostate biopsy H&E slides to predict extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.
methodsA total of 2592 preoperative biopsy H&E slides from 260 consecutive PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were collected from January 2019 to October 2023. Whole-slide images (WSIs) were digitized, tumor regions were annotated, and 224 × 224 pixel patches were extracted. The dataset was randomly divided into training and testing sets at the patient level in a ratio of 8:2. A tumor classification model and an EPE prediction model based on multiple instance learning were trained. Subsequently, we conducted an interpretability analysis of the EPE model and further carried out a correlation analysis between the predicted probabilities of the EPE and the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of the patients.
resultsThe ConvNeXt model achieved the best performance in tumor classification, with an accuracy of 0.965 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.981 on the test set. For EPE prediction, the model achieved AUCs of 0.943 and 0.886 in the training and test sets, respectively. Key features identified by the model, such as nuclear characteristics, were significantly associated with EPE. Predicted EPE probabilities were strongly correlated with BCR (
conclusionsThe AI pathology model accurately predicts postoperative EPE via biopsy slides, achieving an AUC of 0.886 on the test set, offering a novel, feasible PCa preoperative risk stratification method to aid personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.