Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841351›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2025

Deep learning model for predicting extraprostatic extension of prostate cancer based on H&E-stained biopsy digital images.

Peiling Yu, Nan Liu, Dongli Feng, Yi Jing, MoYu Xia, Hongyu Guo, Yinan Yuan, Weilin Guo, Yini Alatan, Siru Nie and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Peiling YuDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Nan LiuDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Dongli FengDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.
Yi JingNeusoft Research of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co. Ltd, Shenyang, China.
MoYu XiaNeusoft Research of Intelligent Healthcare Technology, Co. Ltd, Shenyang, China.
Hongyu GuoDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yinan YuanDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Weilin GuoDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yini AlatanDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Siru NieDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Jinming ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Hongbo SuDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Yuan MiaoDepartment of Pathology, the First Affiliated Hospital and College of Basic Medical Sciences of China Medical University, Shenyang, China.
Qi MiaoDepartment of Radiology, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2235-8997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo develop and validate a deep learning pipeline using prostate biopsy H&E slides to predict extraprostatic extension (EPE) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

methodsA total of 2592 preoperative biopsy H&E slides from 260 consecutive PCa patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were collected from January 2019 to October 2023. Whole-slide images (WSIs) were digitized, tumor regions were annotated, and 224 × 224 pixel patches were extracted. The dataset was randomly divided into training and testing sets at the patient level in a ratio of 8:2. A tumor classification model and an EPE prediction model based on multiple instance learning were trained. Subsequently, we conducted an interpretability analysis of the EPE model and further carried out a correlation analysis between the predicted probabilities of the EPE and the biochemical recurrence (BCR) of the patients.

resultsThe ConvNeXt model achieved the best performance in tumor classification, with an accuracy of 0.965 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.981 on the test set. For EPE prediction, the model achieved AUCs of 0.943 and 0.886 in the training and test sets, respectively. Key features identified by the model, such as nuclear characteristics, were significantly associated with EPE. Predicted EPE probabilities were strongly correlated with BCR (

conclusionsThe AI pathology model accurately predicts postoperative EPE via biopsy slides, achieving an AUC of 0.886 on the test set, offering a novel, feasible PCa preoperative risk stratification method to aid personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Deep LearningProstateProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiopsyHumansMaleMiddle AgedProstatectomydeep learningdigital pathologyextraprostatic extensionmultiple instance learningProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID40841351
PMCPMC12372477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.