Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40841341›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Development and application of a novel tumor habitat analysis technique based on dynamical modeling.

Jack B Stevens, Jihyeon Je, Breylon A Riley, Yvonne M Mowery, David M Brizel, Jian-Guo Liu, Chunhao Wang, Kyle J Lafata

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jack B StevensMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jihyeon JeDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Duke University Pratt School of Engineering, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Breylon A RileyMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Yvonne M MoweryDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David M BrizelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jian-Guo LiuDepartment of Mathematics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Chunhao WangMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Kyle J LafataMedical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Computational tumor phenotyping to interrogate treatment resistance and immune dysregulation in head and neck cancerR01CA289261 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Kyle Lafata · 2024 to 2026
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA289261NCI NIH HHS R01-CA289261U.S. Department of Defense W81XWH2110248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOropharyngeal cancer (OPC) exhibits varying responses to chemoradiation therapy, making treatment outcome prediction challenging. Traditional imaging-based methods often fail to capture the spatial heterogeneity within tumors, which influences treatment resistance and disease progression. Advances in modeling techniques allow for more nuanced analysis of this heterogeneity, identifying distinct tumor regions, or habitats, that drive patient outcomes. PURPOSE: To interrogate the association between treatment-induced changes in spatial heterogeneity and chemoradiation resistance of oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) based on a novel tumor habitat analysis.

methodsA mathematical model was used to estimate tumor time dynamics of patients with OPC based on the applied analysis of partial differential equations. The position and momentum of each voxel was propagated according to Fokker-Planck dynamics, that is, a common model in statistical mechanics. The boundary conditions of the Fokker-Planck equation were solved based on pre- and intra-treatment (i.e., after 2 weeks of therapy)

resultsDynamic tumor habitat analysis partitioned the gross disease of each patient into three spatial subregions. Voxels within each habitat suggested differential response rates in different compartments of the tumor. The minimum mean silhouette value was 0.57 and maximum mean silhouette value was 0.8, where values above 0.7 indicated strong intra-habitat consistency and values between 0.5 and 0.7 indicated reasonable intra-habitat consistency. Nine radiomic texture features (three GLRLM, two GLCOM, and three GLSZM) and SUVmax were found to be prognostically significant and were used to build the multivariate Cox model. The resulting risk score was associated with RFS (p = 0.032). By contrast, potential confounding factors (primary tumor volume and mean SUV) were not significantly associated with RFS (p = 0.286 and p = 0.231, respectively).

conclusionWe interrogated spatial heterogeneity of oropharyngeal tumors through the application of a novel algorithm to identify spatial habitats on SUV images. Our habitat construction technique was shown to be robust and habitat-specific feature spaces revealed distinct underlying radiomic expression patterns. Radiomic features were extracted from dynamic habitats and used to build a risk score which demonstrated prognostic value.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalOropharyngeal NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID40841341
PMCPMC12777982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.