ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2025
Pattern and appropriateness of antibiotic therapy for acute respiratory tract infection among under-five children accessing care in a tertiary facility, Sokoto, Nigeria.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAcute respiratory tract infections (ARIs) are a major cause of antibiotic use among under-five (U5) children, often leading to inappropriate prescriptions that contribute to antimicrobial resistance, adverse drug reactions and higher healthcare costs.
objectivesTo assess the pattern and rate of antibiotic prescriptions and evaluate their appropriateness based on WHO and Paediatric Association of Nigeria guidelines for ARI treatment among U5 children at Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto
methodsA retrospective review of medical records (case folders and prescription sheets) was conducted for U5 children diagnosed with ARI over a 10-month period at the paediatric outpatient and inpatient units, Department of Paediatrics, UDUTH. Data extracted included patient sociodemographic characteristics, ARI diagnosis based on Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses/WHO criteria and antibiotic/medication details (class, name, route, dose, frequency, duration and regimen). Analysis was performed using SPSS V.20.0; p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsA total of 2140 drugs and 1545 antibiotics were prescribed, averaging 2.2 and 1.6 per patient, respectively. Upper respiratory tract infections accounted for 66.2% of antibiotic indications. The antibiotic prescription rate was 100.0 %, with 71.0% administered parenterally. Most prescriptions used generic names (96.5%) and were listed in the National Essential Medicines List (100%). Cephalosporins were most frequently prescribed (46.4%), followed by penicillins; fluoroquinolones were least prescribed (1.2%). Mono-antibiotic therapy was used in 53.2% of cases. Notably, 81.5% of prescriptions came from second-line therapies. Appropriate prescribing was observed for duration (93.6%), dose (66.0%), frequency (69.7%) and indication/choice (66.5%).
conclusionDespite encouraging adherence to appropriate antibiotic dosage regimen, the high rate of antibiotic prescription, parenteral antibiotic administration and alternative antibiotic use highlights ongoing concerns with risk of resistance, adverse effects and treatment failure. Strengthening antibiotic stewardship and adherence to first-line guidelines is crucial to optimise ARI treatment in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.