ArticleBMJ global health2025
Valuing health across groups: a cross-sectional population-based willingness-to-pay survey in Bhutan.
Article in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionContext-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) informed by societal willingness to pay (WTP) are crucial for healthcare resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries. This study investigated WTP for health per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Bhutan.
methodsA WTP survey was conducted alongside the 2023 National Health Survey in Bhutan, sampling 1869 households. Using contingent valuation, respondents assigned monetary values to three hypothetical scenarios: 1 year of cancer symptom-free life, 1 year of perfect health and 5 years of perfect health. We used generalised linear regression to estimate WTP, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and health-related factors, as well as elicitation methods. Multilevel analyses examined WTP variations within and between districts.
resultsWTP estimates were 76 836 Bhutanese ngultrum (BTN) (0.26 times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita; 95% CI: 71 397 to 82 275) for a year without cancer symptoms, 104 381 BTN (0.35 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 96 405 to 112 357) for 1 QALY and 235 237 BTN (0.78 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 218 674 to 251 800) for 5 QALYs. WTP variations were driven by within-district individual characteristics, particularly income and education, rather than between-district differences.
conclusionMinimal between-district WTP variations support a national-level CET for Bhutan. However, WTP-based CETs would be biased upward by wealthier and more educated groups. This bias could justify expensive technologies that strain public resources in Bhutan's government-funded healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.