ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025
In-Context Learning with Large Language Models: A Simple and Effective Approach to Improve Radiology Report Labeling.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study assessed the effectiveness of in-context learning using Generative Pre-trained Transformer-4 (GPT-4) for labeling radiology reports.
methodsIn this retrospective study, radiology reports were obtained from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. Two structured prompts-the "basic prompt" and the "in-context prompt"- were compared. An optimization experiment was conducted to assess consistency and the occurrence of output format errors. The primary labeling experiments were performed on 200 unseen head computed tomography (CT) reports for multilabel classification of predefined labels (Experiment 1) and on 400 unseen abdominal CT reports for multi-label classification of actionable findings (Experiment 2).
resultsThe inter-reader accuracies in Experiments 1 and 2 were 0.93 and 0.84, respectively. For multi-label classification of head CT reports (Experiment 1), the in-context prompt led to notable increases in F1-scores for the "foreign body" and "mass" labels (gains of 0.66 and 0.22, respectively). However, improvements for other labels were modest. In multi-label classification of abdominal CT reports (Experiment 2), in-context prompts produced substantial improvements in F1-scores across all labels compared to basic prompts. Providing context equipped the model with domain-specific knowledge and helped align its existing knowledge, thereby improving performance.
conclusionsIncontext learning with GPT-4 consistently improved performance in labeling radiology reports. This approach is particularly effective for subjective labeling tasks and allows the model to align its criteria with those of human annotators for objective labeling. This practical strategy offers a simple, adaptable, and researcher-oriented method that can be applied to diverse labeling tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.