ArticleHealthcare informatics research2025
Machine Learning-Based Age Prediction with Feature Subset Selection from Magnetic Resonance Angiography Data.
Article in Healthcare informatics research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning (ML) models using selected subsets of features to predict age based on intracranial arterial segments' tortuosity and diameter characteristics derived from magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data. Additionally, this study aimed to identify key vascular features important for predicting vascular age.
methodsThree-dimensional time-of-flight MRA image data from 171 subjects were analyzed. After annotating the endpoints for each arterial segment, 169 features-comprising tortuosity metrics and arterial segment diameter statistics-were extracted. Five ML models (random forest, linear regression, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and lightGBM) were trained and validated. Two feature selection methods, correlation-based feature selection (CFS) and Relief-F, were applied to identify optimal feature subsets.
resultsThe random forest model utilizing the CFS-based 50% feature subset achieved the best performance, with a root mean square error of 14.0 years, a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.275, and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.560. Tortuosity metrics (e.g., triangular index of the left posterior cerebral artery P1 segment) appeared more frequently than diameter statistics among the top five most important features.
conclusionsCFS-based feature selection enhanced the performance of ML-based age prediction compared with using the complete feature set. Linear regression consistently demonstrated the poorest performance across all evaluation metrics. ML-based age prediction using segmental tortuosity metrics and diameter statistics is feasible, potentially revealing significant features related to vascular aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.